This thick? |
I hate having my work critiqued. Who doesn’t? The feeling of
inadequacy, the annoyance (or perhaps anger) when someone makes a comment about
your ‘baby’ that you disagree with, and the stupid feeling when you see obvious
errors. It’s a hardly a fun experience, and you can come out the other end
wondering why you keep putting yourself through the pain.
Despite that, I’ve always considered it a necessary evil
and, no matter how painful, an important learning experience. Not all feedback
need be accepted, and there are, of course, always those problems the writer is
too close to see, but every technical problem shown to you that you didn’t know
before adds something to your writer’s toolkit.
After about five years of having my work torn to shreds,
starting with the not so flattering comment of ‘Well, it hangs together – sort
of’, I still believe that. I’ve come a long way, and cringe when I look at some
work from five years ago. But the process never got any easier.
I would look forward to my crit group meetings, and at the
same time I was eager to let someone – anyone – else go first, and would always
demur when asked if I wanted to go next. The process of working through written
feedback was totally demoralising, and I would procrastinate and find reasons
not to start. When I finally opened that document, I was tense the entire time,
waiting to be torn down or made an idiot of – even though the feedback was
nearly always constructive.
Or maybe this thick? |
When I went on maternity leave a few weeks before the birth
of my daughter, I had plenty of time to write. Owing to the ‘pregnancy from
hell’ (the topic of a yet-to-be-written future post), typing was one of only
two activities I could manage (the other was watching TV). However, also owing
to the ‘pregnancy from hell’, I was far too depressed to contemplate reading
the feedback on my novel. So I did nothing.
In short, if I could have found a real way to avoid this
part of the writing process, I would have. And all this despite the fact I am not
usually a procrastinator, and I spent the first five years of my legal career
having every piece of advice and agreement I drafted also torn to shreds.
And then, two weeks ago, I received a final edit on my short
story ‘Dragon Bait’. I opened it, scanned the comments and suggested changes,
made the ones I agreed with, finalised the document and sent it off to a
magazine.
It wasn’t until a day later I realised I hadn’t
procrastinated, and I hadn’t tensed up. I just did it. A necessary part of the
process, and a job to be completed like any other.
Apparently my skin is now sufficiently dragonhide thick so
as not to bruise my ego.
It only took twenty years!
Logically, it has to happen – if you hope to be a serious
writer. If you traditionally publish, or seriously self-publish, you will have
an editor. If your editor is any good, they will give your darling back to you
covered in red scribble. And this may happen multiple times in respect of
multiple books. If it doesn’t stop hurting, it could turn into a very stressful
career choice!
But it did stop hurting. It happened, and I didn’t even
notice. So now I look back at it and marvel, like a caterpillar turned into a
butterfly, or a fading rainbow glimpsed at the end of the storm.
And I smile.
OK, maybe not this thick after all... And I don't support the slaughter of innocent dragons for gloves! |
If you missed it, check out my guest post on POV Rules and when it's OK to break them here.
If you enjoyed this post, please feel free to check out my previous posts if you haven't already. If you're finding yourself here often, you might as well join as a member, sign up to the blog through RSS or email, or sign up for the newsletter.
Don't forget to share the love and spread the word on Twitter, Facebook or StumbleUpon (or other social networking site of your choice) if you know other people who might also enjoy this.
Thanks for stopping by and visiting with us!
11 comments:
Great post :) It's so true! I don't get upset anymore either but the first few times I took it as a personal attack, how dare they I thought lol. Now it's like, oh, ok they have a point here but I don't agree with that there and I have learnt so much. I love editing other people's stuff and am always mindful that I don't want to hurt their feelings. I think sometimes it's how you give the feedback too ;).
Oh right, so it took you 20 years did it, you mean to tell us you started writing and getting critiques at 5, how green do you think we are young Missy Ballintyne xx
Goodness! I know just how you feel. When I received my first critique I was both floored and angry. I remember thinking, 'How dare they?' , LOL. But nowadays I listen/read and think about the comments raised, without the harsh feelings. A good editor always makes a script better and feedback is there to improve our work, after all.
nice sum-up! I'm a technical writer, so it does hurt like hell when some one else points out that I missed a comma or something equally heinous!!
I admit I may not be very tactful when giving feedback, but I'm certainly not rude or mean about it. Often I spend so much time giving examples, or showing alternatives, or explaining technical craft points I don't have much left to sugar-coat it. And critiquing a novel takes HOURS. But I'm never deliberately hurtful. I guess I give feedback the same way it was given to me the first few times LOL
LOL, Tom. I started writing at 11. I got my first rejection at 16 (too young and ignorant to know what I had written was patently unpublishable). I had a manuscript assessment done at 25, joined a crit group at 26, and now if you do the math you can work out how old I am ;-)
The harsh feelings stopped a long time ago, but I'd still feel uncomfortable/awkward when reading feedback. Happy to say even that is now gone!
Word.
LOL it's even worse when someone tells you, for example, that you've used the wrong viewpoint character for an ENTIRE novel.
Critiquing I usually take very well because it's private, just between me and them. They're usually right and I know when I fix whatever they said, I'll have an even more awesome story. It's the public stuff I hate. Where you publish a novel and it's done and people can still rip it to shreds. Posting my query on agent query connect and having stupid mistakes pointed out. Then I genuinely feel stupid because it's not one person showing me I'm stupid and discussing it with me, it's a whole group of people reading it and seeing it. And it makes me feel vulnerable. Although I've gotten better about handling the query stuff. I'm just scared when I have to deal with the reviews. >_<
I guess my critique group is a bit public - we meet monthly in person and discuss each person's work - and some months there is up to 6 of us there. Sometimes it turns into a bit of a debate! I've never had to handle a review though because as yet I've not published anything.
Post a Comment